After reading the brief autobiographical excerpt from Thich Nhat Hanh, I want you to think about and answer ONE (you can address more, but don't feel obligated to do so) of the following questions:
1.
On p. 159 TNH tells a story about a Zen master answering yes and no
to the same question asked by two different disciples (if a dog has a
Buddha nature). He goes on to explain, "'Yes or 'no' here were not
the truth, but were just a means to point to the truth" (159). Does
this make sense to you? Why or why not?
2. On p.
161 TNH talks about an experience of trying to get a few leaves out of
a container of water. Having been unsuccessful trying a few
different methods, he states, "After I stopped stirring, the water in
the jar continued to swirl, and the leaves rose to the surface" (161).
Does this remind you of the Buddha's teaching on desire? Or the Zen
teaching about thinking? Why or why not?
3. On p. 164
TNH dissuades Vinh (or his "friend") from entering the monastery and
pursuing Buddhism as a way to escape the world. Do you think it is
accurate to say that Buddhism preaches against escapism? Why or why
not?
4. "Buddhism does not tolerate dictatorial
thinking[...]You can[...]make new spiritual discoveries without fear
of being condemned or excommunicated by any power, even that of the
congregation" (168). This statement sounds like a rather liberating
statement. What are the positives aspects of such a teaching? Is
there any danger in such a teaching?
REMEMBER:
No anonymous posts - please post under your first name and last
initial. Refrain from using internet short hand (no 'lol' or 'u,'
etc.). You do not have to create a completely new comment as your
participation; you may respond to someone else's comment as your
contribution and participation, BUT be courteous to other posters. No
personal or ad hominem attacks
Monday, November 19, 2012
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)